Chapter 17

Lean Thinking and the Eight Types of Waste

A practical SME adaptation of Lean waste thinking with examples and a waste-identification matrix.

On this page

Use the headings in the article to move through the guide.

Lean Thinking and the Eight Types of Waste

Lean thinking is a practical way of improving work by creating more customer value with less waste. Waste is any activity that consumes time, effort, money or attention without creating value for the customer or protecting a necessary business requirement.

The direct answer is this: the common wastes in SME processes include defects, overproduction, waiting, unused talent, transportation, inventory, motion and extra processing. They are often remembered as DOWNTIME, but the point is learning to see waste in daily work.

Eight Types of Waste

WasteMeaningSME example
DefectsErrors, correction and rework.Invoice sent with wrong details.
OverproductionDoing work before it is needed.Preparing reports nobody uses.
WaitingPeople or work waiting for the next step.Customer quote waiting for approval.
Unused talentNot using employee knowledge.Frontline staff know the issue but are never asked.
TransportationUnnecessary movement of materials or information.Paper forms moved between offices.
InventoryToo much work or stock sitting idle.Large backlog of open tickets.
MotionUnnecessary movement by people.Searching for files, tools or instructions.
Extra processingMore work than the customer or risk requires.Multiple approvals for a low-risk routine decision.

Waste Identification Matrix

QuestionPossible waste
Are we correcting the same issue repeatedly?Defects
Is work waiting between steps?Waiting
Are people searching for information?Motion / information waste
Are we doing checks nobody uses?Extra processing
Are there many open jobs but few completions?Inventory / WIP

Panith Illustrative Case Study

Panith Illustrative Case Study: A small importer keeps printing order packs, scanning them, then manually entering the same information into a spreadsheet. Staff are busy, but much of the work is extra processing and motion. The first improvement is to remove duplicate entry and create one reliable source of order information.

References and Further Reading

SEO improvement pass: expanded depth and practical application

Expanded Practical Guidance

Waste reduction should not become cost cutting by another name. The first question is whether an activity creates customer value, protects necessary quality or manages real risk. If it does none of these, it is a candidate for removal or redesign.

Unused talent is especially important in SMEs. The people closest to the work often know exactly where time is wasted, but the business may not have a routine for capturing their ideas. Lean thinking depends on respect for people as well as process improvement.

Waste-to-Action Matrix

Waste foundFirst improvement question
DefectsHow can we prevent the error earlier?
WaitingWhat is the work waiting for and why?
MotionWhat are people searching for or moving unnecessarily?
Extra processingWhich check or approval no longer protects value?
Unused talentWho knows the workaround and has not been asked?

Practical Next Step

Run a 30-minute waste walk on one process. Ask the team to identify waste without naming blame. Convert only the top two findings into action.


Visual Learning Aids

The following visual structures translate this lesson into practical management tools. They are designed for SME use and can be copied into a workshop, team meeting or improvement plan.

1. Process Diagram

InputWork systemOutputOwnerMain risk
Customer need or business triggerLean Thinking and the Eight Types of Waste applied to the business processReliable customer or internal outcomeProcess ownerRework, delay or quality failure

2. Flowchart

[Start] Trigger received
   |
   v
[Understand] Work is mapped
   |
   v
[Decide] Bottleneck or waste is identified
   |
   v
[Act] Improvement option is selected
   |
   v
[Review] New way of working is tested
   |
   v
[Improve] KPI review confirms next action

3. Decision Tree

Is the issue clear and evidence-based?
- No: clarify the problem, collect examples and involve the people closest to the work.
- Yes: does it affect customers, cost, quality, risk or growth?
  - No: document the learning and monitor lightly.
  - Yes: assign an owner, choose a practical method, define success measures and review progress.

4. Priority Matrix

Low effortHigh effort
High impactDo first: quick operational improvementPlan carefully: strategic improvement project
Low impactDo only if it removes frictionAvoid or defer unless required for risk, compliance or learning

5. Implementation Timeline

StageTypical SME timingOutput
DiagnoseWeek 1Problem statement and evidence
DesignWeek 2Chosen method, owner and measures
TestWeeks 3-4Small pilot or controlled trial
StandardiseWeeks 5-6Checklist, SOP, dashboard or decision rule
ImproveMonthlyReview notes and next improvement action

6. Illustrative Performance Chart

Illustrative example: replace these sample scores with real business data before using the chart for decisions.

MeasureCurrent scoreTarget scoreVisual gap
Clarity2/54/52 blocks to 4 blocks
Ownership2/55/52 blocks to 5 blocks
Measurement1/54/51 block to 4 blocks
Consistency3/54/53 blocks to 4 blocks

7. Maturity Model

LevelMaturity stageWhat it looks likeNext improvement
1Informal workInformal work is visible in the way the business manages this topic.Documented process
2Documented processDocumented process is visible in the way the business manages this topic.Measured process
3Measured processMeasured process is visible in the way the business manages this topic.Controlled process
4Controlled processControlled process is visible in the way the business manages this topic.Continuously improved process
5Continuously improved processContinuously improved process is visible in the way the business manages this topic.Sustain and refine through periodic review

8. Comparison Table

DimensionCurrent-state processFuture-state process
Decision basisExperience, urgency or individual memoryEvidence, agreed criteria and visible trade-offs
AccountabilityUnclear or dependent on the founderNamed owner with clear responsibility and review rhythm
MeasurementDiscussed only when something goes wrongTracked using cycle time, first-time-right rate, cost and customer impact
ScalabilityWorks only while the team is smallCan be taught, repeated and improved as the business grows